687 Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Betweenlaparoscopic Versus Open Versus Robotic Partialnephrectomy: A Systematic Review

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic (LPN), open (OPN), and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) using standardised system, Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). Method The was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search performed on Cochrane, Embase PubMed databases. Articles January 2016 December 2021 were included. Perioperative investigated include: estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time (OT), conversion rate (CR), warm ischaemia (WIT), positive surgical margin (PSM), postoperative complications CDC. Results study included 12 studies, a total of 3,908 patients. (LPN = 1,120, OPN 1,206, RPN 1,580). LPN demonstrated lower overall EBL (p 0.004). There no significant difference OT 0.291), CR 0.200), WIT 0.760), PSM 0.549), CDC I 0.556), II 0.779) CDC≥III 0.663) three approaches. Conclusions Compared RPN, EBL. All other similar results treatment modalities. Future large-scale, prospective, randomised studies is necessary draw definitive conclusion from this analysis.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) also known as tennis elbow is a common disease of middle-aged population.Surgery is a treatment of choice in patients not responded to the conservative management. Open and arthroscopicrelease are the two main choices for LE surgery; however, an overall consensus is not available. This study was aimedto compare the clinical outcomes after conventional open...

متن کامل

Open versus robotic cystectomy: Comparison of outcomes

Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the current gold standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. As surgeons become more proficient in minimally invasive and robotic surgical techniques, the number of patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasing. Although minimally invasive methods are on the rise, research that critically compares open surgery with robot...

متن کامل

Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND Thymectomy is the mainstay of treatment for thymoma and other anterior mediastinal tumors, and is often utilized in the management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). While traditionally approached through a median sternotomy, minimally invasive approaches to thymectomy have increasingly emerged. The present systematic review was conducted to compare perioperative and clinical o...

متن کامل

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review

You may download, copy and otherwise use the AAM for non-commercial purposes provided that your license is limited by the following restrictions: (1) You may use this AAM for non-commercial purposes only under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license. (2) The integrity of the work and identification of the author, copyright owner, and publisher must be preserved in any copy. (3) You must attribute ...

متن کامل

A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison of Perioperative and Early Renal Functional Outcomes of Robotic versus Open Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES To compare the perioperative and early renal functional outcomes of RPN with OPN for kidney tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 209 RPN or OPN patients with availability of preoperative cross-sectional imaging since 2009 at our center were included. To adjust for potential baseline confounders propensity-score matching was performed, which resulted in 94 OPNs matched to 51 RPN...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Surgery

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1365-2168', '0007-1323']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad258.727